ferebeast.blogg.se

#Acronis true image 2015 boot usb install
#Acronis true image 2015 boot usb drivers
#Acronis true image 2015 boot usb software
#Acronis true image 2015 boot usb windows 8.1
#Acronis true image 2015 boot usb free

If the Windows Recovery Environment is missing or Acronis Media Builder is unable to detect it, choose the second or third option.

#Acronis true image 2015 boot usb drivers

In case of significant hardware upgrade scenarios, like a migration from old SATA HDD to a faster m.2 NVMe SSD you may need to add drivers for the new hardware on the next step of the Media Builder. Windows Recovery Environment is recommended, because it usually has all the drivers required for the successful hardware recognition.

Select a toolkit that you want to be used for the rescue media creation.

The option "32-bit (x86)" under the "Architecture" drop-down list is for very rare cases of tablets and other devices, that run 32-bit UEFI firmware - not to be confused with 32-bit Windows!

Choose 64-bit (圆4), regardless of whether your Windows is 64-bit or 32-bit.

If you select the option "WinPE-based media": Using bootable media created with WinPE may provide better compatibility with your computer’s hardware because the preinstallation environment uses Windows drivers. Anyway I am old school guy, I don't even have a smart phone yet, LOL.First, select the bootable media type: WinPE-based media or Linux-based media. Therefore when I have a chance to use a boot USB/CD to do imaging, I restrain from installing the imaging app.

#Acronis true image 2015 boot usb software

I want to keep my system as clean as possible by minimizing unnecessary software on my computer. In reality these situations are very rare so I find myself keep using the OS for several months to half a year. I normally restore the images when I suspect there could be slight chances of malware infection, or somehow the system is broken. So I never find the need to image the OS partitions frequently. I keep all data files separate from the OS partitions, and back them up frequently manually (using Windows Explorer copying LOL).

#Acronis true image 2015 boot usb install

The way I do it is clean install an OS, install major programs (MS office, photoshop, acrobat etc), update, then delete all temp files, and cold image the whole OS using at least two imaging apps (choose among IFL, Acronis, Shadow Protect, Paragon and Clonezilla), store the image files on at least two extra HDDs (one internal, one external). Me however, kind of used to the cold imaging of an OS. Hot imaging nowadays is much more convenient than the old school boot USB method, and it's reliable also. Consequently I have since uninstalled ATI 2014 and I now only use its Linux boot disk for backing up (and I continue to use DS as well). That said, the ATI 2014 installation was huge (in size) and hot backups had some quirky issues. In all of the preceding cases the resulting image sizes were pretty close, with ATI's images about 5% larger than those of DS. For cold backups, ATI 2014 leaves DS in the dust, backing up in about half the time of DS! ATI 2014 is also nearly twice as fast as DS making differential snapshots (DS doesn't do incrementals), but (interestingly) I find DS is able to complete its restores in about 10 - 20% less time than ATI 2014.

#Acronis true image 2015 boot usb free

Insofar as performance, I found the free ATI WD Edition to be totally crippled, taking at least double and often triple the time of ATI 2014 to backup and restore! For hot backups, ATI 2014 was about 20 -30% faster than Drive Snapshot (depending on whether I was backing up my Win7 or XP system). I did not upgrade to ATI 2015 as the ATI 2014 boot disk works great on my Win7 and XP systems and the 'what's new for 2015' didn't impress me. I am an Acronis TI 2014 user, along with Drive Snapshot and formerly, the free ATI WD Edition. Looks like Acronis and SP would be my imager of choice for Windows system in a while. Granted, I only use the boot CD and image from outside of Windows.

I know it was fast before, but did not realize it's so much faster than other imagers.ĭespite ppl reported bugs in the 2015 version, I have been using Acronis for more than 10 years and never had any problems. The speed of Acronis is just too impressive. The most significant difference is the time used: Acronis only needed 1.7 min, SP 3.2min, and IFL 5.1min. The resulting images are almost the same size: Acronis image: 11.6GB, IFL image 11.7GB and SP image 12.4 GB. The only options I changed were the compression level: for Acronis and SP, used high compression for IFL, used enhanced size - A. In all three programs, default parameters are used. The test was to image the whole SSD OS drive, and saved the images to the HDD drive. Have a 2nd HDD in the same computer as a storage drive.

#Acronis true image 2015 boot usb windows 8.1

File system is NTFS, Windows 8.1 Enterprise X64 on a 128GB SSD. Tested the backup speed for three imagers (all boot cd, and cold image): Acronis TI 2015, IFL v2.93 and Shadow Protect v5.2.4.